On 01/06/13 08:07, Farmer Giles wrote:
On 31/05/2013 23:40, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
Farmer Giles wrote:

On 31/05/2013 23:08, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:


http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS..._Fukushima_rad


iat

ion_risk_3105131.html

And in the 1600s it was witches. I imagine harry would have ben there
with the best of them, lighting the logs under the "witch" because
she
floated when they dunked her.


One thing we can always rely on with the nuclear lobby is their
ability to tell lies, and I bet the next one will be to tell us you've
solved the problem of what to do with the increasing amount of nuclear
waste.

Unless, that is, you try the even bigger lie that there is no problem.

You're nodding off worse than harry. As was discussed on "The Life
Scientific" on R4 back on January sometime, waste from today's reactors
(and future ones) is a *solved * issue, and the small amount of high
level waste is converted to glass blocks and the like. This solution has
been in place and in use for 20 years.

The waste from *bomb* production is another matter and is a problem. But
it will be a problem WHETHER OR NOT we build new reactors.

What I write here should be understandable even by you dimwits.


Yep, just as I thought, more lies.

If it's all so simple perhaps you could advise Sellafield, they seem
to be having a spot of bother.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-21298117#


1/. That is a legacy from the bomb era.
2/. That is the BBC, chief organ of the "we love windmills/hate
nuclear" lobby.

--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.