On 01/06/13 07:04, harry wrote:
On Jun 1, 3:30 am, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
On 31/05/13 23:32, Farmer Giles wrote:







On 31/05/2013 23:08, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS...tweigh_Fukushi...
ion_risk_3105131.html
And in the 1600s it was witches. I imagine harry would have ben there
with the best of them, lighting the logs under the "witch" because she
floated when they dunked her.
One thing we can always rely on with the nuclear lobby is their
ability to tell lies, and I bet the next one will be to tell us you've
solved the problem of what to do with the increasing amount of nuclear
waste.
Unless, that is, you try the even bigger lie that there is no problem.
Of course if you start from bigotry, everything proves the case. No one
died after Chernobyl? Obviously its being covered up...

You are a lying toad TurNiP' Full of ****. Are you in the pay of
someone?
Thirty one people died shorty after the disaster and many more will
die.

78 people have died. Thatsit. over 100,000 were preduicted/.

http:

The same people who write global warmning ****e in wiki write anti
nuclear ****e.

Show me the hundred thousand corpses harry.

The final chernobyl death toll is 78 confirmed deaths from radiation.
Mostly firefighters.
The AVERAGE radiation level in Pripyat is similar to Dartmoor.
As usual the disaster was not reported it was covered up.

oh harry can i sell you a tinfoil hat?

Even the russians cant cover up 100,000 + deaths spread out across NW
Europe.


Evacuation did not start until 36 hours after the disaster.
(Ha Ha As if they thought they could deny it! But it was the
instinctive response of the nuclear industry. Denial),
It was detected in Sweden first, they thought they had a leak in
their own reactors

And that's why 3000 non fatal thyroid cancers were caused. No iodine
pills and no temporary evacuation. However I-131 is gone in weeks.




--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.