On 31/05/2013 23:40, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
Farmer Giles wrote:

On 31/05/2013 23:08, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:


http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS..._Fukushima_rad

iat

ion_risk_3105131.html

And in the 1600s it was witches. I imagine harry would have ben there
with the best of them, lighting the logs under the "witch" because she
floated when they dunked her.


One thing we can always rely on with the nuclear lobby is their
ability to tell lies, and I bet the next one will be to tell us you've
solved the problem of what to do with the increasing amount of nuclear
waste.

Unless, that is, you try the even bigger lie that there is no problem.

You're nodding off worse than harry. As was discussed on "The Life
Scientific" on R4 back on January sometime, waste from today's reactors
(and future ones) is a *solved * issue, and the small amount of high
level waste is converted to glass blocks and the like. This solution has
been in place and in use for 20 years.

The waste from *bomb* production is another matter and is a problem. But
it will be a problem WHETHER OR NOT we build new reactors.

What I write here should be understandable even by you dimwits.


Yep, just as I thought, more lies.

If it's all so simple perhaps you could advise Sellafield, they seem to
be having a spot of bother.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-21298117#