DIYbanter - View Single Post

Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

On Thu, 30 May 2013 07:09:30 -0500
"Attila Iskander" wrote:
"Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
wrote in message
news:20130530004650.7bab5b0d9a42e3ee5d5b1dba@fidem turbare.com...
On Wed, 29 May 2013 23:04:52 -0400
wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2013 18:42:27 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the
non-existent atheist goddess" wrote:
On Wed, 29 May 2013 03:05:42 -0400
Ben Kaufman wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 10:58:46 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 08:22:37 -0400, Ben Kaufman
wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 22:27:54 -0500, "Attila Iskander"
wrote:
"Ben Kaufman"
wrote in message
...
On Fri, 24 May 2013 22:34:11 -0500, "Attila Iskander"

wrote:
"Not X" wrote in message
...
On 05/24/2013 08:20 AM, PV wrote:

[snip]

Sexual orientation is not a choice, however atheism is,
so why must Scouts
change to accommodate those that choose atheism?

Atheism is simply the state of NOT being afflicted by a
debilitating condition. It is NOT a choice, the same way
NOT having Alzheimer's disease
isn't a choice.

You are not born atheist
It's a choice you make somewhere along the way.

Actually, you were born atheist. You didn't believe in any
gods until an adult
spoon fed it to you as the facts.

NOPE !
You were born a blank page
That means at best you were born agnostic.

Get yourself a dictionary and learn the meaning of words

Nope, you can't even be an agnostic until someone tries to
make you believe that gods are real. And of course, young
children are vulnerable to this sort of brain washing.

You're born caring whether there is a God? That means that
there must be a God. God, you're an idiot!

You have zero reading comprehension, and an apparent severe
learning disability to continue spewing ad hominem after it was
explained to you how poorly this reflects on your ability to
debate.

He was debating? I thought he was seeking an education.

Once again you prove just how illiterate you are.

Please clarify what you mean by "illiterate." The reason I make
this request is that I suspect you aren't conforming to the common
comprehension of it as an inability to communicate in written form
(by reading or writing) by using at least one intelligible language.

Illiterate at it's root, means not able to read
But it also means uneducated. from not doing much reading.

I do not object to that definition.

What a dumb****.

Your fallacious ad hominem attack doesn't help your position.

It was a declarative statement,not an ad hom

The context in which that declaration was asserted made it conclusory.

--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Better than larger values
However true their show
This timid life of Evidence
Keeps pleading -- I don't know."
-- E. Dickenson