View Single Post
  #269   Report Post  
Posted to alt.atheism,alt.religion.christian,free.usenet,alt.home.repair,alt.politics.homosexuality
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default Boy Scouts Vote To Allow Gays

On Wed, 29 May 2013 21:06:38 -0400
wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:47:29 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist goddess" wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 11:18:31 -0400
wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 16:48:00 -0700, Fidem Turb?re, the non-existent
atheist goddess wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 09:33:27 -0400
wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
In article ,
Alfred E. Newman wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:36:09 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
wrote:
In article
,
Mitchell Holman nomailverizon.net wrote:

Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth
May 23 2013

GRAPEVINE, Texas -- The Boy Scouts of America voted
Thursday to end its controversial policy banning gay
kids and teens from joining one of the nation's most
popular youth organizations, ditching membership
guidelines that had roiled the group in recent years.
Over 61 percent of Scouting's National Council of 1,400
delegates from across the country voted to lift the ban,
BSA officials said. The final tally was 757 yes votes,
to 475 no.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...couts-vote-to-
lift-ban-on-gay-youth?lite

It's about ****ing time!

Next step is to allow atheists. Until that day, the Boy
Scouts are still a bigoted organization.

--

JD

Jeanne, why do you say they are still bigoted? Is it because
you weren't allowed to join because of what you have between
your legs? Or was it because of what you don't have between
your ears?

I had the Girl Scouts available to me. A FAR better
organization than the Boy Scouts.

Nonsense. If that's true, why are so many girls trying to get
into Boy Scouts? Boy Scouts has a much larger and stronger
organization, with more programs, camps, and outings.

If girls really were trying to get into the Boy Scouts,

They are.


Can you prove that?

they'd most
likely be Catholic Girls coveting some new "experiences." If
their motives were purely to become Scouts, then your suggestion
seems ludicrous because there's another very similar organization
which is famously known as "Girl Scouts."

A poor imitation. But do pay attention (I know you're stupid, but
try). That's what the thread is about.


Your fallacious ad hominem attack doesn't help your position.


Even after having it explained to you, you're to stupid to get it and
think you have to repeat yourself. What a dumb****!


Your fallacious ad hominem attack, which includes a spelling error,
doesn't help your credibility.

With regard to the Boy Scouts being a "stronger organization,"
that's just a reflection of the behaviour exhibited by those who
feel threatened by homosexuality (even though a person's private
sexual encounters really are none of their business).

Idiot.


Your unsubstantiated ad hominem attack doesn't help your position.


See above, dumb****.


Ditto.

Completely irrelevant and wrong (but that's to be expected).


It is relevant because a fear of homosexuality has been a serious
hinderance to the reputation of the Boy Scouts as an organization.


There is no fear, dumb****.


It appears that 39% of the Boy Scouts might be homophobic.

The fear is in your remaining neuron, which is obviously getting
quite lonely.


What part of the concept of "non-existence" is it that's most troubling
for you?

Additionally, I contend that I am correct with regards to a person's
private sexual encounters being a matter that doesn't concern the Boy
Scouts, and I disagree with you that the inverse is expected.


It never did. Only their public actions.


What public actions? Were they publicly engaging in sexual intercourse
while also representing the Boy Scouts? If not, then it shouldn't be
an issue for the Boy Scouts as an organization.

You really are stupid!


Your fallacious ad hominem attack doesn't help your argument.

Sadly, our troop leader was a bitch who favored her daughter
and her buddies over the rest of the troop, so I dropped out
as soon as I was allowed.

You learned well.

That's not a matter of learning, rather it's a matter of
exercising judgement based on values of fairness.

Being a bitch? You should know. You're hers.


Your fallacious ad hominem attack confirms that you feel threatened
and angered, most likely because you know that you're wrong. If you
didn't feel intimidated by your error, the need to respond ad
hominem would be non-existent (that last word is meaningful to me).


Not at all "fallacious" (you must have had mommy look that one up for
you). You really are her bitch, dumb****.


Can you substantiate your claim that I have a mommy and that she looked
up the word "fallacious" for me?

Your use of profanities to express your anger and frustration when
presenting fallacious assertions doesn't help your argument.

Do you feel intimidated when other people exercise judgement based on
values of fairness because it's not consistent with the various
religious delusions that many people suffer from?


Once again you show exactly how self-important you lefty loons are.


I did not claim to be important, and your fallacious ad hominem
attacks don't help your argument.

I bet your only grade is school was "present". What a dumb****.


Your implicit offer to engage in gambling is not accepted because your
fallacious ad hominem attack that follows in the next sentence fails to
add meaningful value to this social intercourse we're engaging in.

--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"If you wake up tomorrow morning, thinking that saying a few Latin
words over your pancakes is going to turn them into the body of Elvis
Presley, you have lost your mind, but if you think, more or less, the
same thing about a cracker and the body of Jesus, you're just a
Catholic."
-- Sam Harris