On May 25, 12:32*am, nestork wrote:
Attila Iskander;3067848 Wrote:



Please educate yourself BEFORE you come back to spout more ignorant
nonsense.

This whole discussion is stupid because it presumes that every burglar
is going to have a hand gun.

First, I didn't see anyone make that presumption. Second,
every burglar doesn't need to have a gun, only the one that
enters *your* house is what matters. And why are you limited
to burglaries? In my world, it's not burglaries that are the
cause of most violent confrontations. Have you not heard about
home invasions, nuts high on drugs, ex-boyfriends, ex-husbands,
etc that smash into homes and kill people?





That's BS.

I have had several burglaries in my building over the past 25 years, and
the few times that the culprits were ever confronted, they relied on
their ability to outrun the tenant or myself to get away. *If they had a
handgun, then they certainly didn't even show it. *And, in both cases
where the persons who broke in or were trying to break in were
confronted, neither the tenant nor myself felt in any danger because as
soon as we started going after them, they ran away.

Well, if you confronted a burglar and didn't feel any danger,
then you are indeed either a liar or an idiot. Even if I had a
shotgun and confronted a burglar I would feel in danger. And
it's nice that the ones you encountered ran away. Let's see
how you feel when you encounter one that doesn't just run
away, perhaps because they are high on meth, for example.




You guys watch too much TV. *The people I confronted were a couple of
natives that looked like they were homeless, and would have drank a gun
before they went to all the trouble of breaking into a washing machine
for it's stash of quarters.

--
nestork

Incredibly naive.