"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 23/05/13 12:01, Simon Brown wrote:


"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 23/05/13 03:11, Simon Brown wrote:


Now explain why it did not happen in all those
places that used very little fossil fuel or chemicals
in their agriculture in the last couple of decades.

Tell me where those places are,

China, much of Africa, much of SE Asia, much
of India and Pakistan and Bangladesh etc.

and what their populations densities are.

Much higher than in Britain.

I thik you should checkl that out,

No need with Bangladesh alone.

and china india much of SE asia use TONNES of fossil fuel.

Not for subsistence agriculture they dont.

10 acres for a family is what it takes to feed them house them and
clothe them and feed them and keep them warm in winter. in the UK.

Plenty managed on much less than
that before the industrial revolution.

No, they did not.

Yes they did. It was nothing like that in Ireland for example.

24x7 hard grind.

Agriculture before the industrial revolution was nothing like that.

Since every statement you make is essentially false,

Easy to claim...

based on no evidence whatsoever,

We all swooned at the wealth of evidence you provided.

I think its time to plonk you.

Fat lot of good that will do you.

It certainly isn't worth trying to educate you.

Fools like you in spades.