On 23/05/13 12:01, Simon Brown wrote:


"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 23/05/13 03:11, Simon Brown wrote:


Now explain why it did not happen in all those
places that used very little fossil fuel or chemicals
in their agriculture in the last couple of decades.

Tell me where those places are,

China, much of Africa, much of SE Asia, much
of India and Pakistan and Bangladesh etc.

and what their populations densities are.

Much higher than in Britain.

I thik you should checkl that out, and china india much of SE asia use
TONNES of fossil fuel.

10 acres for a family is what it takes to feed them house them and
clothe them and feed them and keep them warm in winter. in the UK.

Plenty managed on much less than
that before the industrial revolution.

No, they did not.

24x7 hard grind.

Agriculture before the industrial revolution was nothing like that.
Since every statement you make is essentially false, based on no
evidence whatsoever, I think its time to plonk you.

It certainly isn't worth trying to educate you.


--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.