On Sat, 18 May 2013 16:35:53 -0500, Gordon Shumway
wrote:

On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:22:41 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 18 May 2013 18:24:19 +0200, nestork
wrote:


Only in America can you promote violence against the government and be
protected by the right to free speech, but if you even hint that if
scientists were to study people the same way we study animals, we may
very well discover that there ARE significant differences between the
various races of homo sapiens that populate this good Earth.

The above paragraph makes no sense. In the context of the thread it
makes even less.

But, since Hitler and that little spat called WWII, ANY type of
scientific investigation into the similarities and differences between
human populations is verbotten cuz it smells like racism.

History is a good teacher.

With 50 percent of all black children in the USA being born to unwed
mothers, and over 75 percent of the inmates in Canadian jails being of
aboriginal descent, maybe it's time we took our blinders off and
recognized that there may be differences in the hardwiring of our
brains, and that everything doesn't come down to environmental factors.

That is a racist statement any way you cut it.

I, for one, believe that no matter how nurturing the environment, a
Mexican chihuahua will never grow into a Great Dane. We believe that of
Mexican Chihuahuas, why do we not recognize the same MAY be true when we
speak of different races of people? We're just not going to know until
we look, and it's verbotten to look.

Very good. You've earned the racist of the week award. You can go
back to your lynching now.

I often agree with your posts. However, this time I do not. You did
an excellent job of proving his point. Well done.

I didn't say there was only one racist here.