Bob Eager wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 16:52:04 +0100, Norman Wells wrote:

Bob Eager wrote:


The third one was rejected as the serial number said it was 'non UK
stock'. The dealer changed it for another (pre-vetted number) one and
it all went through fine. £300 in total!
And not fraud at all?

Why on earth should it be fraud?

It would be fraud if they changed the invoice so that it no longer
matched the printer. If they replaced the printer, at the same time, it
would probably be OK.

However, the original sale might have been fraudulent if they had
claimed that it qualified for the cash back.