On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:29:28 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Apr 24, 1:07*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:34:51 -0700 (PDT), "





wrote:
On Apr 24, 11:12*am, nestork wrote:
[_2_ Wrote:

;3052257']
How much better at it does the typical Muslim suicide bomber
get? * You watch the news much? *You're making the huge assumption
that because you want to escape and go hide, that these terrorists
have the same objective. *In most cases, the operatives at the
level of these bombers don't have that objective. *They are OK
with dying a marter and going off to heaven. *One of these terrorists
achieved that, the second came very close. *Or they want to go
out in a blaze of glory, getting more recognition and coverage.
They achieved that too, didn't they?

The great advantage that a suicide bomber and kamikaze pilot have is
that they don't have to bother making a plan to elude capture after
their attack. *That's something that the authorities have a lot of
trouble dealing with.

Again, if they are so dumb, why are 4 people dead and 150 injured in
the biggest attack on US soil since 9-11?

Oh, I never said those bombers were dumb. *I said that being amateurs
they were prone to make dumb mistakes just like every amateur does in
every new endevour they try. *They carried out a successful attack
largely because they had the element of surprise on their side and a
powerful bomb. *What they didn't have was any sort of well laid plan to
evade capture after the attack,

You're assuming that they cared, that evading was on their agenda.
With most of these terrorist attacks, including the worst one of all,
9-11, that was not a concern.

This was *obviously* not a suicide attack.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I never said it was. Only that just like with a suicide attack,
the terrorists may be willing to sacrifice themselves for the
cause and may not give a **** about getting caught.

How do you get that? They *were* trying to escape. Good grief,
you're dense.