On 4/22/2013 11:44 AM, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
wrote:

On Apr 22, 11:20 am, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:57:36 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer









wrote:
On Apr 22, 10:44 am, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:18:52 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer

wrote:
On Apr 22, 9:22 am, Ed Huntress wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:49:07 +0700, J.B.Slocomb

wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 01:50:09 -0500, Richard
wrote:

On 4/21/2013 12:08 AM, jon_banquer wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:25 am, wrote:
On 4/20/2013 10:54 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:

Anyway, I've long since put it behind me. It sounds like it still eats
at you. Again, I'm sorry for that.

It always will, Ed.

You can admit what eats at you. Ed can't.

Ed still has tons of things that still eat at him but he can't admit
it and pretends he's put it all behind him. He hasn't. Ed is filled
with anger and rage. To cover it up he often accuses others of being
angry and filled with rage.

That's a pretty common thing.

Just look at the stranger creatures that post here.
LOTS of repressed rage and transference.

Not to defend Ed but are you sure that the others you mention are
demonstrating "repressed rage and transference", or are just shouting
abuse from behind their mother's apron as believe that they are safe
on the Internet.

I have always surmised the latter :-)

Transference is the term for seeing your own denied faults in other.

Thanks for the comment, JB, but trying to analyze Jon's emotional
problems online is a fruitless exercise. His symptoms would challenge
any professional shrink. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

When you have to resort to talking to a sock puppet like J.B. Slocomb
is I think that alone is very telling about how many issues you have,
Ed.

Well, Jon, I'm not discriminating about who I'll talk to. Hell, I'll
even talk to YOU, until you get too nasty. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

I agree that you're not discriminating at all, Ed. That you're proud
of not being discriminating speaks volumes about what your true self-
esteem is.

As I said, Jon, I'll even talk to *you*.

What would you like to talk about next? How about, "How Social Media
Has Impacted The Metalworking Manufacturing World."

It should be a really short thread.

--
Ed Huntress

You could make many threads even shorter by moving on but that would
deny you the immense pleasure you get from being smarmy and claiming
you don't care.

I think your admirers on your LinkedIn group are calling you, Jon.

His chest-puffing about his LinkedIn followers is hysterical. I think
LinkedIn, for now, is just a more narrowly focused Facebook and not
terribly useful, although it seems to be evolving into something more
useful; it's just not there yet. I have linked with a lot of people in
LinkedIn, but like the earlier days of Facebook, it seems to be
something where people think it's cool to collect the largest number of
connections (or "friends"), as if that's the goal - some kind of prize
given out. I don't use LinkedIn for any practical purpose at all, and
to the best of my knowledge, none of my professional colleagues do. My
career (as opposed to my employment) is a little in the doldrums, so
maybe it's time to do a little work and see what LinkedIn might do for
me, but I think the answer at present is, "not very much."

jonny bonkers is just an asshole, and I doubt very many people pay much
attention to anything he says or does on LinkedIn or Twitter.


Maybe you'd better spend more time over there. They get lonely without
you, and just worshipping your golden statue isn't enough for them.

They need the real thing. Go help them out, Jon.