View Single Post
  #89   Report Post  
Posted to misc.legal,alt.home.repair
Bill Graham Bill Graham is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Time and a half for over 40 hours

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 19:35:57 -0400, wrote:




Why should anything be mandatory?


So you don't believe people should get paid for the hours worked, if
they get fired, either?


Where did I say that? I didn't.


Really, if you pay people enough
they can take care of the "benefits" as they see fit. Except that
most people don't have the willpower to save.


Vacation is a benefit to the employer, as well.


But needs and wants vary. Some people like to take long vacations,
others would rather have the money. No reason that the employee can't
have some say in what they do and prefer.


Some work schedules are other people dependent, such as an assembly
line or food service. Other people work independent of each other
and can be more flexible. I know a fellow that worked for a
software company. The rule was: you have to work 240 eight hour
days a year. This is what your pay will be every month.


OK, what's that got to do with the discussion?


The fact that with a system of that sort, there is no overtime, no
lateness, no sick days, no absenteeism, no pay variances, almost no
limit on vacation time other than a 125 day maximum if you work it
right. It empowers the employee to take care of business as he sees
fit.


Sounds like socialism to me. "The poor employee is incapable of taking care
of himself and making the right decisions in his life, so we will have to
tell him what to do. How to live, when and what vacations to take, what
benefits he should receive.... After all, we can;t have any of the ants in
the colony just going off on their own, can we?