On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:01:18 PM UTC, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,

Martin Brown wrote:



So to avoid that short term hardware cost and retaining trained SAR

teams we outsource it and get royally ripped off in the longer term

losing most of our military SAR capability too. How very clever



You can justify "royally ripped off" can you, with facts and figures? Or

is it more bluster.

I'd liek to know the reason(s) why they are taking it over first.
Is it really to save us the UK money ?