On Mar 26, 1:34*pm, Nightjar
wrote:
On 26/03/2013 12:50, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
...

And this is where the skeptics smell a rat. The data isn't enough. its
being SPUN by the likes of the guardian. Which leads to the inevitable
question

"Why do you need to spin, if te data supports the thesis so well?"

And of course the answer is that it doesn't support it at all well...

The chap in charge of the Hadley Centre said, when asked why he would
not release their data, that opponents would only use it to prove the
Hadley Centre conclusions wrong. If they were sure of their ground, that
should not be possible.

Colin Bignell

At least one of the climategate e-mails shows "warmists" would rather
delete their data than release it under a FOI request.

Why would that be?

MBQ