On 2/28/2013 10:25 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Swingman writes:
On 2/28/2013 8:33 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:

If those ads were served by a third party (e.g. google ads), then it's because you've allowed
them.

What an ignorant, bull**** attitude and remark ... what ****ing planet
you been living on?

I'm not sure why you felt it necessary to rant. I made no value judgement,
just stated a simple fact.

Why? Because you made an accusatory, smug declaration, as "fact", and
which contains NO basis in "fact" whatsoever.

The "fact" is that it is the client side execution of a script is what
ALLOWED those "ads to be served by a third party" to the web browser in
question.

Brian himself said there are no Google ads, another "fact" which you
clearly assumed?

Brian serves a banquet, from caviar (video content with value), to
conversation (comment section).

There is also a ham sandwich available ... but no one is forcing you to
eat the ham sandwich but ignorance of the "fact" that Brian is not
forcing you to.

That is a "fact" ...

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)