On 2/26/2013 3:54 PM, Gunner wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:59:06 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:43:14 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:58:49 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:24:57 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:26:51 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:35:36 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"
wrote:

When I was in school, we learned of a concept
called "ex post facto". It's not legal for the
government to change the law later, and make
something legal (when you did it) into illegal,
later.

Later, changed the law to make them illegal.
That's a violation of a very old principle.

Which some buttheads don't understand.

Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.

Since ex post facto laws are prohibited by the US Constitution,
Article 1, Section 9, it seems likey that you don't understand what an
ex post facto law is, or that the story below is a bunch of bull.


You seem to forget the California SKS laws, Eddy.

Wrong, on two counts.

Then you lied. Shrug

No, you're just suffering from your education deficiency.

Denial is not a river in Egypt, Eddy.

Third time today you used that hackneyed expression, gummer.