On 2/25/2013 11:28 AM, Gunner wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:53:25 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:



http://www.davekopel.com/2a/lawrev/35finalpartone.htm


VBG

You just hate that dont you?

No, we've already discussed it. Plimpton pointed out the same thing to
you: it's a dog's breakfast of dicta and dissenting opinions. No
binding precedent.

Yes..it most certainly is.

No, absolutely it is not. There isn't a single holding in it. It's
nothing but dicta and dissents - nothing binding at all.


And here you go waving Heller as something new.

Heller is, indeed, the *first* time the court has held that the right to
keep and bear arms is an individual right.