On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:53:25 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:



http://www.davekopel.com/2a/lawrev/35finalpartone.htm


VBG

You just hate that dont you?

No, we've already discussed it. Plimpton pointed out the same thing to
you: it's a dog's breakfast of dicta and dissenting opinions. No
binding precedent.

Yes..it most certainly is. And here you go waving Heller as something
new.

It's useful history. It's up to the courts, though, if they'll pay any
attention to it. All they have to pay attention to now is Heller.

You didnt read the other "its up to the courts" in the provided link
did you?


Laugh laugh laugh!!

Nitrous?

Liberal Buffoonery.

Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie