On Feb 24, 10:44*pm, "
wrote:
On Feb 24, 5:37*pm, wrote:









On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:42:38 -1000, dsi1

wrote:
On 2/24/2013 2:46 AM, The Daring Dufas wrote:

The P.L.L.C.F. are always trying to push junk science and technology..
Electric vehicles have their place but the Moonbats are determined to
push immature technology upon the citizenry especially when there is
no widely established infrastructure to support it. When you see The
President and congressmen traveling around in battery powered limousines
and The Capital and White House powered completely by solar
cells and windmills, the technology will be ready for the masses. Until
that happens I'll be very skeptical that the present national energy and
transportation infrastructure should be scrapped for something from
La La Land. ^_^

TDD

It's a good thing for us that folks who said that the infrastructure was
not in place and that the moonbats were trying to replace horses and
buggys with new-fangled automobiles were unable to convince the
citizenry of their anti-progressive ways. What model carriage do you
drive, sir? :-)

The new model carriages were not forced on anyone. *There *IS* a
difference. *When economics wins, everyone wins. *When it takes a back
seat, everyone loses.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Not to mention that the new-fangled autos had clear
advantages over the horse and buggy. *With electric
cars the pitch relies on, yeah they cost a lot more,
even with huge tax subsidies and they don't go very far,
but folks should buy them to reduce their reliance on fossil
fuels. *Hence, sales are pretty much confined to rich hippies. *Did
they even have hippies back in 1900?

Back in 1900 cars were only for the rich too.
Everybody else was a hippy but not by choice.