View Single Post
  #436   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Gunner[_7_] Gunner[_7_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,346
Default [OT] Second Ammendment Question

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:53:04 -0800, a friend
wrote:

On 2/24/2013 9:00 AM, Richard wrote:
On 2/24/2013 8:47 AM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
http://jpfo.org/alerts/alert20021003.htm


Thanks, Storm.
Very important piece you brought in.



This is not Germany in the 1930s. And registration of guns had nothing
to do with them murdering Jews. They round up Jews whether they had
guns or not.


Bull****.

Ed. can you POSSIBLY imagine trying to round up Jews in Texas?
Yes, we have plenty of Jews here.
And yes, they are quite often armed.
Rounding up these suckers is going to be a problem!




The Iraqi army was pretty well armed too, probably better armed than any
citizen in texas given that they had full automatic weapons, and armor,
and if you believe news reports, we didn't have much trouble "rounding
them up". Anyone who believes the second amendment would prevent the
army from taking them away is delusional.


So the Iraqis fought in asymmetrical warfare? Fascinating. And here
we were all thinking they were in trenches and armored weapons and
foxholes and were giving up out in the middle of the desert whenever a
Hummer came along.

Got cites?

Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie