View Single Post
  #418   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
Gunner[_7_] Gunner[_7_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,346
Default [OT] Second Ammendment Question

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:53:48 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:


Want me to continue?

Yes, but this time try looking for court cases that evoke these
amendments in relation to voters. They all "involve" voters.


Oh..court cases like Dred Scott and other abortions done by nitwits?


Dred Scott was overturned by the 13th Amendment.


And DCs gun ban of 4 decades was overturned by Heller. Yet you
claimed that The Law was what counted. Sucks to be you and have your
law overturned doesnt it?


The 9th explains that the B of R is not an exhaustive list; there are
unenumerated rights, as suggested in the 14th (equal protection -- you
have the same rights as everyone else), 15th (prevents denial of
suffrage), 24th and 26th (both regard voting rights and suffrage. The
10th acknowledges other rights reserved to the States or people.

The Voting Rights Act and a variety of other laws engage the
unenumerated rights, and the states declare who has rights to vote.
Under the 14th (federal) Amendment, the states have to grant those
rights to everyone.

You do have a right to vote. But you have to register.


Indeed. But which Amendment requires registration of firearms?


I think you'll find that the Necessary and Proper clause covers it,
and Heller describes numerous cases of restrictions (like concealed
carry) that were common in the 19th century and that the Court does
not question in this case. Registration, not really being a
restriction at all, but only a formal licensing, certainly would fall
within the "laws imposing conditions and qualifications" that the
Court said it would not question, in Heller.


Yet the Constitution was Written in the 18th Century. Say...what
about that DC gun ban before Heller? Lots of case law and many people
in jail before Heller. Now what..do all those people get a apology and
a cash settlement for time served?


Isnt that part of the Shall not be "broken/violated/trangressed" you
blithered out in another post


Not according to the lengthy list of citations contained in Heller,
nor in the Heller decision itself.


You keep spewing about Heller..which was a partial correction for 100
yrs of Unconstitutional law. Next you are going to revert back to
Scalia. You really do have the keyhole view dont you?

Pity.



Snicker

Snickers are my wife's favorite candy bar.


Yes and?


And Reese's Pieces.


Milkman named Reese?

--
Ed Huntress



Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie