On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:51:34 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:


Don't try that cheap shot with me, Gunner. You aren't fooling anyone.

You repeated that silly quip without even thinking about what it
means. If it "isn't needed until they try to take it," then you don't
think it's "needed" to protect yourself against an intruder (he
doesn't give a damn about no steenking Second Amendment, he just wants
to shoot you), right?

In other words, you didn't think. You just jerked your knee.

I dont need those pesky fire extingushers and seat belts until the
moment I need them.

'Same with the 2nd. But that's not what the quip says. It says you
don't need them until someone tries to take the 2nd Amendment away. It
says nothing about home assaults, or personal assaults, or citizen
militias, or other militias.

Of course not. The Second Amendment isnt only about fighting off those
pesky common criminals. Its also about killing those pesky
politicians.

You dont understand that?

I thought you were a wonder brain....sad really to find one of my
icons no better than a slug mentally.

Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie