On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:37:30 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:58:31 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:31 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:54:52 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:52:28 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

Gun restrictions are a convenient way to attack and punish "them"
while distracting attention away from the hazards that are important
to "us", such as the drugs (legal and otherwise) that keep your heads
together.

Poor paranoid gun nut, you're so abused. People actually threaten to
make you responsible for the things you own and what you do! The NERVE
of them!

Eddy is another one that always forgets:


"the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

It's not, Gunner. You can have guns. In fact, you do.

Some guns yes. But in California..we are not allowed to have some
guns. Our rights are indeed Infringed.

Your opinion about that, and a dollar, will get you a cup of coffee.

Scalia laid out plenty of examples in Heller that demonstrate the
historical meaning of the 2nd. They are explicit that it never meant
what you think, that limits and regulations were always a part of it.

Scalia is 1 of 9...and only one of many thousands on SCOTUS since 1789

He (and many others) have pussy footed around the 20,000 existing
(unconstititional) laws that have been put on the books since the
founding of this nation.

Cant blame him (or them) too much though...giving their constitutional
Rights back to the People makes Leftwingers tremble and scream and
**** in their loafers..so he/they are having to do it incrementally.

All those racist Democrats who first put gun control laws on the books
to limit blacks access to arms.....shrug.


Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie