On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:58:31 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:31 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:54:52 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:52:28 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

Gun restrictions are a convenient way to attack and punish "them"
while distracting attention away from the hazards that are important
to "us", such as the drugs (legal and otherwise) that keep your heads
together.

Poor paranoid gun nut, you're so abused. People actually threaten to
make you responsible for the things you own and what you do! The NERVE
of them!

Eddy is another one that always forgets:


"the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"

It's not, Gunner. You can have guns. In fact, you do.

Some guns yes. But in California..we are not allowed to have some
guns. Our rights are indeed Infringed.

Your opinion about that, and a dollar, will get you a cup of coffee.

Scalia laid out plenty of examples in Heller that demonstrate the
historical meaning of the 2nd. They are explicit that it never meant
what you think, that limits and regulations were always a part of it.

--
Ed Huntress