On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:21:02 -0600, "Attila Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:24:50 -0600, "Attila Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:48:20 -0600, "Attila Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:41:34 -0600, "Attila Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message
news:hbadh8p8l45qk8ssff0s7grlrd48pq2m62@4ax .com...
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 08:45:31 -0600, "Attila Iskander"
did NOT write any of the **** below
Let's see
1) We need to get rid of people with guns
That would be about 88.8 persons per 100 in America
2) Best solution - shoot them
The housing market would collapse
3) But that means that the shooters are people with guns
Dipshiate left that part out
4) So it follows that they should be shot first.
And along with them, those who propose shooting people
simply
because they own guns
When would be a good time to shoot you ?
Yesterday?
Next time learn how to post.
There is nothing wrong with the above posting style. "In the
interleaved reply style (also called "inline reply", "point-by-point
rebuttal"..."the original message is broken into two or more sections,
each followed by a specific reply or comment."
You are the first to ever complain.
Have a nice day!
YOU MORON !
It's NOT the ****ing style, you screwed up
It's the attribution
You put my name to something I didn't post
HEY ASSHOLE, you are lying or a complete idiot. You replied to the
troll and I snipped and replied to you with my comments "in-line".
Here is the HEADER and the *entire* message - so **** off! It is plain
for others to see, look in your outbox.
Oh, you can put me in your killfile. Liar
So You cut the context to make it sound like my paraphrase were what
I
intended to post
You are the one who created the lie by removing the context
Look in your mirror bub
The liar is you/
I didn't make anything "sound" like anything.You cut what I just said.
See how cutting context can change things
Since YOU have no problem doing it to me, STOP WHINING when it's doene
to you.
You did post what you said you didn't.
I PARAPHRASE the OP's post YOU ****ING MORON !
And YOU CUT the part which CLEARLY SHOWS that it was a PARAPHRASE of what
the OP wrote, and thus ascribed the content to me..
Are you really this ****ing stupid ?
I simply replied in the first thread.
The information you posted.
YOU CUT the IMPORTANT PART that showed I was PARAPHRASING, you ****head
Yet are you are denying you never posted what I replied too.
harry needs a playmate, argue with him..
You're far closer to his level, you do it
Everybody here is suppose to know you were "paragraphing".
You denied you said what you said, after you attacked me. You got
caught, saying you did not say what you did SAY. Said I gave the wrong
the attribution in the thread.
Should I give the header and message again? They do not lie!
For the record you are not ****ing around with harry here. I called
you on your lie and bull****.
Best now you shut up. Adults were talking before you made an attack on
me. I never attacked you with a SIMPLE reply to what you stated and
then denied you said.
Go swap spit with harry. He needs your attention.
You get the last word, even lying about what you said, good day.
****in' immigrant!! Poor child doesn't know what side you are on.