On Feb 5, 8:21*pm, "ARW" wrote:
michael adams wrote:
"ARW" wrote in message
...
michael adams wrote:
"ARW" wrote in message
...
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. He knobbed another woman
and he got caught by the wife.

The fact that it was 10 years ago that she took the 3 points for
speeding does not matter to her. Her claws are out. You cannot
reason with them when you have not been caught with your
trousers down - so what chance do you have when you have been
caught shagging someone else?

Except his wife had nothing to do with it. As she knew as
well as he did that is saying anything at all she'd simply be
landing herself in the **** as well. As its a bit late
for her to be coming up with excuses.

Huhne made the big mistake of telling his son, Peter the Plonker
about what had happened years ago, who being a bit on the thick
side - then decided to get all self righteous by threatening
to report dad to the police, quite overlooking the
fact that he'd be dropping mummy in it as well.

quote

" But text messages between Huhne and his son Peter, sent
in May 2011 and declared admissible in court by Mr Justice
Sweeney, revealed Peter put pressure on Huhne to "accept
responsibility" for the offence.

Peter said: "We all know that you were driving and you put
pressure on Mum. Accept it or face the consequences. You've
told me that was the case. Or will this be another lie?"

Huhne replied: "I have no intention of sending Mum to
Holloway Prison for three months. Dad"

A year ago, Huhne told reporters he was "innocent of these
charges" and vowed to fight them in the courts

His son asked: "Are you going to accept your responsibility
or do I have to contact the police and tell them what you told
me?" later adding: "It's not about her its about your accepting
your responsibility to me."

/quote

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21320992

To repeat "Your responsibility to me".

What a prize ****.

All three of them are as thick as pig ****.

Now what a surprise "Vicky Pryce 'wanted revenge' over Chris
Huhne's affair"http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21333624

You were right first time, not me. It was the wife who brought
him down by going to the Sunday Times. Although the son's
emails were earlier, they never became public until later

I was not points scoring - *I just know scorned women better than most
people:-)

It's very hard to work out quite who's the most stupid
person in all of this.

There is a choice of 3:-).

1. Chris - he decided to have an affair with a bisexual woman and did not
ask his wife to join in for a threesome.

2. Vicky - who says "Chris committed a crime 10 years ago and I know that as
I helped him do it" exactly one week after she found out that she had not
been invited for a threesome or did not like the taste of another womans
juice on his cock.

3. Their son. Who I would very much like to take on as an apprentice and
welcome him into the real world:-) Apart from defending his Mum he has not
actually done a lot wrong IMHO. And who knows what Mummy asked him to say
and do? Sure he's a dick, but look at his parents.

He sounds thick enough for you to get along with.