On Feb 5, 11:22*am, Doug Miller
wrote:
Gunner wrote innews
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:02:28 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
wrote:
Gunner wrote in
news:mqa2h8d23r0f5rtet5lao7f1c68dd3gno3@ 4ax.com:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:00:12 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
wrote:
Gunner wrote in
news:hea1h85a40ne2uumo5r9cr6n5nsm84afmi@
4ax.com:
Dougie...feel free to eat the peanuts in my ****.
Google "42,000 highway deaths"
About 34,600,000 results (0.50 seconds)
http://www.law.yale.edu/news/6832.htm
No, *you* eat ****, dumbass -- that article is FIVE YEARS OLD.
So?
So what *was* true in 2007 is no longer true in 2013. Apparently
you find that concept difficult to grasp.
So you have the cites for 2013? * Crystal ball or just a oji
board?
The only change from then to now..is homicides have gotten
FEWER and vehicle deaths are virtually unchanged.
Liar. Deaths in motor vehicle accidents are down from 43,945 in
2007 to 34,677 in 2011. That's a drop of 21%, not "virtually
unchanged".
Liar? Provide the cites
Yes, you're a liar. *It's odd that you would ask for cites, since
you never provide any to back up your bull**** -- but since you
asked, here they are.
2011 data:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_06.pdf
2007 data:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_19.pdf
Idiot.
you can be kill filed with 2 key strokes. *And nothing less is
warranted.
I'm not surprised that you would killfile someone who keeps
calling you on your bull****. So go ahead, killfile me. Every time
you post bull****, I'm still going to call you on it -- and
everyone *else* can still see it, and everyone *else* will know
you're posting bull****.
So go ahead. I don't care.
You didn't even LOOK at the date on it, did you? Idiot.
VBG
snort I was right, obviously.
You are an "idiot" and one easy to amuse.
The only idiot here is you, Gummer -- you can't find anything but
outdated data.
Run along now, Gummer. Come back after you manage to find the
CURRENT data.
No official studies have given firm data yet for 2012. * So
the best anyone can give is data 2 yrs old.
You're not even looking at the 2011 data, you idiot. You're
still looking at 2007.
Now go away, Gummer, and don't come back until you've figured
out how to find CURRENT data.
So lets see your cites for 2013.
I never claimed to have any, just for 2011. But you can't even
manage to cite *one* recent year -- you just keep dredging up data
from 2007 and claiming that it's "unchanged" from then.
And that's a lie, Gummer.
And you *know* it's a lie, Gummer.
"I'm not surprised that you would killfile someone who keeps
calling you on your bull****. So go ahead, killfile me. Every time
you post bull****, I'm still going to call you on it -- and
everyone *else* can still see it, and everyone *else* will know
you're posting bull****."
Not Mark Wieber's cult followers which easily make up the majority of
this newsgroup. They love how Wieber panders to them and they just
can't get enough of it.