"ARW" wrote in message
...
michael adams wrote:
"ARW" wrote in message
...
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. He knobbed another woman
and he got caught by the wife.

The fact that it was 10 years ago that she took the 3 points for
speeding does not matter to her. Her claws are out. You cannot
reason with them when you have not been caught with your trousers
down - so what chance do you have when you have been caught
shagging someone else?

Except his wife had nothing to do with it. As she knew as
well as he did that is saying anything at all she'd simply be
landing herself in the **** as well. As its a bit late
for her to be coming up with excuses.


Huhne made the big mistake of telling his son, Peter the Plonker
about what had happened years ago, who being a bit on the thick
side - then decided to get all self righteous by threatening
to report dad to the police, quite overlooking the
fact that he'd be dropping mummy in it as well.

quote

" But text messages between Huhne and his son Peter, sent
in May 2011 and declared admissible in court by Mr Justice
Sweeney, revealed Peter put pressure on Huhne to "accept
responsibility" for the offence.

Peter said: "We all know that you were driving and you put
pressure on Mum. Accept it or face the consequences. You've
told me that was the case. Or will this be another lie?"

Huhne replied: "I have no intention of sending Mum to
Holloway Prison for three months. Dad"

A year ago, Huhne told reporters he was "innocent of these
charges" and vowed to fight them in the courts

His son asked: "Are you going to accept your responsibility
or do I have to contact the police and tell them what you told
me?" later adding: "It's not about her its about your accepting
your responsibility to me."

/quote

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21320992

To repeat "Your responsibility to me".

What a prize ****.

All three of them are as thick as pig ****.

Now what a surprise "Vicky Pryce 'wanted revenge' over Chris Huhne's affair"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21333624


You were right first time, not me. It was the wife who brought
him down by going to the Sunday Times. Although the son's
emails were earlier, they never became public until later


The journalist - Sunday Times political editor Isabel Oakeshott -
isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the box either. Given that
she sent an email to Pryce which on the face of it seems to
be advising her to perjure herself if put on trial-

quote

Ms Oakeshott later replied: "The bottom line is that
this story will bring Chris down if you are prepared
to go on the record, with the minor risk this carries.

"I think you can make yourself out to be very much the
honourable one, saying it has very much been on your
conscience ever since, saying you knew it was wrong
but you were bullied into it."

quote

"Make yourself out to be" - i.e. pretend to be something
you're not when being questioned under Oath.

Advice sent in an email which might well be produced in
a Court of Law.

A journalist desperate for a story might well
encourage Pryce to go ahead and make all sorts
of promises, and give all sorts of advice, but as
with a solicitor's sometimes questionable advice,
none of this would ever be committed to paper,
let alone an email.

It's very hard to work out quite who's the most stupid
person in all of this.


michael adams

....













--
Adam