On 05/02/2013 12:41, mike wrote:
On Feb 5, 10:38 am, "michael adams" wrote:

Huhne's only a prat for not punching the ungrateful little
git in the mouth IMO. Who exactly does diddums Peter think
has been putting food in his mouth, clothing him, feeding
him, and arranging for his education for the first 17
years of his life ?

As a fully paid up member of the "Entitlement Generation"-
"because I'm worth it", The self serving little **** was more
than happy to bleat on to to Huhne about "Your responsibility
to me". So what about his responsibility to his parents ?
To keep them both out of Court for one.

I wonder how many people on here feel their parents only fed them for
eighteen years on the tacit understanding they'd perjure themselves
for them if they were ever caught in an act of criminality?

Perhaps the lad felt his societal obligations to stand up to a crooked
criminal politician outweighed some spurious "blood" loyalty. Seems
to me he's done well to grow up with some principles despite being
raised by a thoroughgoing ****e of a father.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#axzz2K0d9Po2D

If Huhn snr. were a man rather than the pious self-serving **** he
reveals himself as in those text exchanges, he'd have taken the points
and chowed down on it rather than trying to palm them of on his wife
and drag others into his spineless immorality.

It's a shame they can't jail his barrister as well for blustering on
about "gossamer-thin evidence".

If he were not a hypocrite, he as green minister would not having been
consuming excess fuel by speeding... (I'll hazard a guess that it was
not a super-fuel-frugal model either.)

--
Rod