On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:10:19 -0800, Gunner
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:42:26 -0500, Ed Huntress
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:07:48 -0800, Delvin Benet ýt wrote:

On 2/1/2013 1:46 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:


"Delvin Benet" wrote in message
.. .

On 2/1/2013 10:56 AM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Friday, February 1, 2013 1:07:18 PM UTC-5, Delvin Benet wrote:
On 2/1/2013 6:14 AM, rangerssuck wrote:

On Friday, February 1, 2013 2:06:08 AM UTC-5, Delvin Benet wrote:


snip


Laws should be passed ONLY if they have some logical connection with the

goal to be achieved. Gun registration has *no* connection with

preventing gun violence. It doesn't even serve a useful purpose for

trying to capture and prosecute people who commit gun crimes.

Gun registration would help to achieve those goals by making it more
difficult for criminals to get the guns that they use to commit the
crimes.

No, it wouldn't make it more difficult in the least. A criminal who
steals a gun doesn't know, nor care, if that gun is registered or not.
And registration doesn't prevent, deter or discourage a criminal from
buying a gun. A background check might help there, but not registration.

================================================== ====================
(EH)

Registration is about restricting the transfer of guns from legal
purchasers to criminals.

No, it is not. It's about massively intrusive government getting set up
to confiscate guns.

That makes you a paranoid delusional, Delvin. There is no evidence
that the US government intends to confiscate guns. What they're trying
to do is to dry up the supply of guns to criminals. They've said it,
and there is nothing sensible to refute it.

In other words, you've earned a spot in the Gun Nutz bucket.

Eddy is in Denial again. He must have gotten a gig from Chucky Schumer
again. How many pieces of silver is he paying you Eddy?

Gunner

How are your other paranoid delusions sooking, Gunner? How's that
"Great Cull"? That was supposed to happen sometime last year, wasn't
it? Did the cullers get stuck in traffic? ggg!

Schumer may want to ban guns, but he's not what you have to worry
about. He's one vote in the Senate. On the other side is a
congressloon who wants to arm all of the janitors. Have you talked to
a school janitor lately? Help us Jesus....

What you have to worry about is public opinions, like these:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/othervi...c-support.html

Every time Wayne LaPierre or one of the other wind-up dildos opens his
mouth, the anti-gun sentiment seems to inch a little higher. The
public is beginning to realize that the spokesmen for the pro-gun
cause actually are a little crazy. Or maybe a lot crazy.

That's what will bite you in the ass, in the long run. And if you guys
keep it up, it will bite all of us.

--
Ed Huntress