On 31/01/13 11:32, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:05:09 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 31/01/13 10:45, Brian Gaff wrote:
Well, that is surprising, for a government is it not? Erm no its not. I
seem to recall the reason in this country why a lot of companies
eventually did not embrace nuclear was due to the costs involved which
mainly were a tax from Government, disguised as a cost of
decommisioning levy or some such tosh.
Brian

And massive liability insurance for an accident that will never happen.

If it would never happen, the premium would be zero ?

You haven't worked for insurance companies then have you?


--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.