"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 31/01/13 10:45, Brian Gaff wrote:
Well, that is surprising, for a government is it not? Erm no its not. I
seem
to recall the reason in this country why a lot of companies eventually
did
not embrace nuclear was due to the costs involved which mainly were a tax
from Government, disguised as a cost of decommisioning levy or some such
tosh.
Brian

And massive liability insurance for an accident that will never happen.

Except that if you let them operate without any liability they will operate
shoddily and the chances of one happening will increase substantially

tim