On 31/01/13 10:45, Brian Gaff wrote:
Well, that is surprising, for a government is it not? Erm no its not. I seem
to recall the reason in this country why a lot of companies eventually did
not embrace nuclear was due to the costs involved which mainly were a tax
from Government, disguised as a cost of decommisioning levy or some such
tosh.
Brian

And massive liability insurance for an accident that will never happen.


--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.