View Single Post
  #70   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Attila Iskander Attila Iskander is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 886
Default OT Feinstein's List


"Robert Macy" wrote in message
...
On Jan 28, 5:48 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:50:50 -0800 (PST), Robert Macy





wrote:
On Jan 27, 5:35 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:56:38 -0800 (PST), Robert Macy


wrote:
On Jan 26, 1:13 pm, wrote:
...snip...
Uh, it is my understanding that we already have law since before
70's
that prevents one from 'over exuberance' Not sure, but I think the
wording is that once you have removed the threat of bodily harm
from
your assailant you are NOT allowed to pummel them anymore. The law
was
designed so that if somebody comes at you with a knife, you take
the
knife away removing the threat of bodily harm, you are then NOT
allowed to beat the assailant into unconsciousness - preventing you
from trying to administer punishment for the original assault..


Who is "we"?


We live by laws of rule. If there is a law in place, then we all live
under that law. Thus, "we already have law..." means exactly that. WE
all live with that law.


Refusal to answer the question noted.


Huh? ...again, the we refers to fellow U.S. citizens.


Then you're full of ****. *WE* do *NOT* all live under the same laws.
These are states issues. I don't happen to live in a state that I
must cower in a corner hoping the moron doesn't decide to kill me. He
crosses my threshold (doesn't even need to go that far) and he's
pushing daisies. I really don't give two ****s if he has a knife or a
toothpick. If you live in a candy-assed Europeon wannabe state, your
problem.

Unless there was
a bit of humor in your question that eluded me.and still eludes me.


No, I was wondering just how FOS you were but you've made it perfectly
clear.

#
# didn't know that this specific law was a state law only. makes sense
# that it probably is not a federal one.

That does suggest that you should do some more checking before making any
more of your ex cathedra declarations.
mmm ?


#
# So at least a citizen can still vote with their feet and move to a
# more amenable state.
#

As has been evidence by the migration out of California, for example.