View Single Post
  #55   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Robert Macy[_2_] Robert Macy[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 796
Default OT Feinstein's List

On Jan 27, 5:35*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:56:38 -0800 (PST), Robert Macy





wrote:
On Jan 26, 1:13*pm, wrote:
...snip...
Uh, it is my understanding that we already have law since before 70's
that prevents one from 'over exuberance' *Not sure, but I think the
wording is that once you have removed the threat of bodily harm from
your assailant you are NOT allowed to pummel them anymore. The law was
designed so that if somebody comes at you with a knife, you take the
knife away removing the threat of bodily harm, you are then NOT
allowed to beat the assailant into unconsciousness - preventing you
from trying to administer punishment for the original assault..


Who is "we"?


We live by laws of rule. If there is a law in place, then we all live
under that law. Thus, "we already have law..." means exactly that. WE
all live with that law.


Refusal to answer the question noted.


Huh? ...again, the we refers to fellow U.S. citizens. Unless there was
a bit of humor in your question that eluded me.and still eludes me.