View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
nestork nestork is offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2,498
Default

The tilex is going to dry out a lot faster than the wood will. That's because the tilex is just on the surface of the wood, whereas the moisture in the wood has had the time to penetrate into the wood cells, and it takes a lot longer for water to evaporate through the wood cells walls than it does for Tilex to evaporate directly into the air.

That just looks like wet wood to me as well.

Really, what you need to do is scratch at that wet wood with your finger nail. If you can scratch that wood away with a fingernail, it's rotted. Otherwise, it's fine. Wood, being a natural material, stands up to occasional wetting much better than most building materials (like plaster or drywall).

I wouldn't bother with Tilex. I'd spray bleach straight out of the jug on that wood to kill any mildew or mold that might be there.

You can avoid further wetting of that wood by providing for an air gap between the insulation and the roofing boards, and allowing cold outside air to get in at the eves of your house, and out through a ridge vent along the ridge of the roof. The idea here is that the unavoidable heat loss through your insulation drive a convective air current from the eves to the ridge vent. That convective air current dries out any frost or condensation that forms on the underside of the roof.

The other side of the argument would be: If the house is 50 years old (I'm thinking because they used lumber for the roof sheathing instead of plywood or OSB), and there's no wood rot, then why not put the existing fiberglass insulation back in, and we're good for another 50 years. And, I would have difficulty giving a good reason NOT to do that. Millions of houses across North America don't have any roof ventilation at all, and yet most of them never have any serious problems with wood rotting in their roofs.

Last edited by nestork : January 28th 13 at 07:16 PM