View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
HeyBub[_3_] HeyBub[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,538
Default OT Feinstein's List

wrote:

"All semiautomatic rifles that can accept a detachable magazine and
have at least one military featu pistol grip; forward grip;
folding, telescoping, or detachable stock; grenade launcher or rocket
launcher; barrel shroud; or threaded barrel."


The above should be more than enough to convince any
reasonable person what a complete moron she is. So,
a rifle without a threaded barrel is just peachy keen.
But put a threaded barrel on it and it's banned. WTF?
Threads kill people? Same insanity with grips. Like
banning a pistol grip is going to make a substantial difference in any
of the recent shootings?


The threaded barrel enables the goblin to attach a suppressor ("silencer"),
flash hider, or grenade launcher. My state recently passed enabling
legislation allowing suppressors - for hunting, target practice, etc. With a
suppressor, one could theoretically take down the whole heard of wild hogs
without them being spooked by the first BANG. Likewise, rifle ranges would
irritate neighbors less if they were quieter.


Then we have:

"All ammunition feeding devices (magazines, strips, and drums) capable
of accepting more than 10 rounds."


That bans the magazines sold today with probably 90% of the
pistols not just in the USA but around the world. Which is exactly
what the libs are up to. They rail on about 100 round mags,
30 round mags, but then deliberately screw all the legal
gun owners out there by putting 10 or 7 in the actual law,
instead of 15 which would cover that 90%.
And just like in NY, when 10 doesn't work, next step is 7.


They don't want 10-round magazines; they want the issue. Whether the bill
passes or fails is irrelevant.