"J.B.Slocomb" wrote:

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:42:02 -0800 (PST), rangerssuck
wrote:

On Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:39:04 PM UTC-5, RD Sandman wrote:

The difference between firing 30 rounds from a single high capacity
magazine and firing 30 rounds from three 10 round magazines is about 6
seconds. Not a lot of time in a room full of people.

In that case, what is your argument for NOT banning the high capacity magazines?

But why ban something that in reality has nothing to do with the
problem?

Or is it simply to be seen to have done something, even if
ineffective? the ultimate politically "statement".


It's just more slight of hand to deflect attention from an issue they
refuse to deal with. The mentally ill voted for him, they are his
people.