Dave Balderstone wrote in
news:140120131257471761%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderst one.ca:

In article , Mike Marlow
wrote:

I understand that, but I have seen similar reports of where reported
observations were perhaps not discredited, but were at the very least
countered by other observations that we exactly the opposite. Like I
say - I don't really have a stand on the matter because too much of
this goes back and forth between each side with what appears to be
nothing more than claims from each.

NASA , the Met and the IPCC seem to be backing away pretty quickly
from claims of warming... As in, none since 1997.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/...ast_reports_we
r e_junk.html

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...warming-alarmi
s m-192334971.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...arming-stopped
-
16-years-ago-Met-Office-report-reveals-MoS-got-right-warming--deniers-n
o w.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Selective quoting by everyone. For instance, the IPCC has indeed
committed gross errors, so obvious that a 3 year-old could see them.
That does NOT mean there is no human-caused warming.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid