On Jan 11, 3:04*pm, Jon Danniken
wrote:
On 01/11/2013 10:07 AM, wrote:



Yeah, it's pretty lame. * There are already cordless blenders
that use rechargable batteries for those that don't want a
cord. *I don't need one of those either. *This new thing is like
us hearing for years about how your refrigerator is going to
be connected to the internet. *Another solution in search of
a problem.

What's lame about it? *Seems to be a pretty innovative application of
inductive power transfer that is already in use with electric
toothbrushes and cellphones.

If you have no need for the new technology then this doesn't affect you,
unless you just like complaining because it is new.

Jon

What's lame about it? Let's start with that fact that you
would need to install the other half of the blender under
the counter. That enough for me. Then look around at
kitchen counters. I don't know about your house, but here
every counter has a drawer under it. Even if you have some
locations that don't have drawers, it's going to severly limit
where you could install this thing. Then, if you do install it,
you have to keep that spot free for the blender.
Oh, and did I mention price? What do you think that piece
of junk is gonna sell for? And what exactly is the big problem
here that it solves?

Not only is it lame, but so is the company showing it.
"Wireless blender? According to all the other product
terminology out there, it's should be called a "Cordless blender".
Routers and modems are wireless. Chainsaws, vacuums,
and blenders are cordless. There are even cordless
blenders out there already, so there really ain't much new
about this. But glad it impressed you....