In article om,
dennis@home scribeth thus
On 09/01/2013 09:59, tony sayer wrote:
In article om,
dennis@home scribeth thus
On 08/01/2013 14:29, tony sayer wrote:
In article om,
dennis@home scribeth thus
On 08/01/2013 09:27, tony sayer wrote:
OK - TV's have always been specialist - but most other machinery was
pretty
simple.


I dont think TVs were THAT specialist when they were full o' valves


Now this is a good point. A TV of say 1960 or even earlier had pretty
straightforward circuitry so much so that I managed to convert a 1960's
era 405 line set to 625 lines and it worked very well.

Course these days a few chipset's and well, what can you do with
those?...




Reprogram them, put a different OS on, change the jumpers, quite a lot
if you want on most modern sets.


Can you give us an example as to say how you'd change the sound
intercarrier ?...

Or the vision modulation demodulation?..

Would you give an example of which chipset you need instructions for.
You could always choose one with a DSP that you know how to use so you
needn't ask questions that you aren't going to get an answer to.
Who knows? you may even be able to emulate a service remote and change
them to what you want with ease.

Which just shows how totally ignorant you are with TV now Denise.

None of this is now done anymore, intercarrier sound and vision
modulation of carriers..

Analogue TV has now gone out of fashion..


Do I need to remind you that you are the one that asked about them.

You Might have noticed that those two techniques are now out of
fashion!...

--
Tony Sayer