"Doug" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:34:40 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:06:37 -0600, Doug
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:01:28 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:25:27 -0600, Doug
wrote:

On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:21:32 -0600, " Attila Iskander"
wrote:


"Doug" wrote in message
news:cdc6e8pm7qvc37hnbs9461sd0ngshii8d6@4ax. com...
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:49:40 -0600, " Attila Iskander"
wrote:


"Doug" wrote in message
news:li1hd8pvsuu7o6jl9r7c066rve514icnlm@4a x.com...
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:37:10 -0600, " Attila Iskander"
wrote:


"Doug" wrote in message
news:at6fd81p7bjm34afm92siidneahpg2nrig@ 4ax.com...



I think teachers should just teach. I think armed guards
(professionals) will be better at protecting the students. I'm
not
saying that armed teachers can't protect students but I see
potential
problems with this idea.

Go ahead and list them


If you can't figure out what they are, I give up. I honestly
thought
it was intuitive.


What you are really saying is that you can NOT list them to support
your
argument
In an intelligent debate, the debaters LIST their arguments instead
of
expecting others to "intuit" them

But considering your past performance and all the silly things you
assumed
to be true, yet were patently false, that comes as NO surprise
YOU definitely are one of those that Ronald Reagan meant in:
"It's not that our friends on the Left are ignorant..
It's just that so much of what they know is wrong.."


Wrong according to whom ? Please give me the authoritative source.

I'm still waiting for you to list the reasons for teachers not to be
armed
You first alphonse



You already know the answer !!

Yes, we do; you're stupid.


LOL

You can laugh at your stupidity (the insane often do). The rest of us
think it's pretty sad.


I'm beginning to understand how you think "in your world".

Well, no matter what, it's still far, far more thinking than you seem to
have achieved..
So where's that list of "potential problems" ?