On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:23 -0600, Doug
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:37:16 -0600, "ChairMan"
wrote:

Doug wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:51:34 -0500, Kurt Ullman

wrote:

In article ,
Doug wrote:

Ok but where does it say "ANY" arms in the constitution?

Constitutions, espeically the American one, work the
other way. IF
they wanted limits, the FF put them in. Since it doesn't
say "all
arms but these..." then, by definition, it means all
arms.

No, not per CNN legal. They basically opposite to you.

CNN???
see what I mean, Dug?
LOL


Maybe read about the Supreme Court case "District of Columbia v.
Heller" . Court clearly does not agree with "ANY".

Did you read that on CDC.GOV? Douggie, you're *really* out of your
league. Learn something or go away. Since the first is apparently
impossible...