On 12/27/2012 4:06 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 12/27/2012 12:24 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
If the shooter in conn. didn't have, or have access to a semi-automatic
military assault weapon, all those kids would still be alive. That
is an
undisputable fact.

He would have simply gone in with more clips, guns, or far worse yet, a
bomb. The kids would still be dead and perhaps many more.






No it's not a "fact" of any kind:

1) You don't know what he would have done had he not had access to an SA
weapon. The day after Sandy Hook, 20 people so were *knifed* in China.

2) "Military assault weapon" is an undefined and undefinable notion.
The military uses full auto, for one thing. Moreover, something isn't
more dangerous because it looks "military". This little chestnut
is just more droning from the left because they don't understand guns
as tools but instead have a sort of mystical understanding of weapons.


In related news, the fork made Rosie O'Donnell fat ...