On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:40:30 -0600, Doug
wrote:

On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:03:14 -0500, z wrote:

On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:43:25 -0600, Doug
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:38:04 -0700, Ashton Crusher
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:57:29 -0600, Doug
wrote:

On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:51 -0600, " Attila Iskander"
wrote:

snip

STUDIES show that gun-control has NO EFFECT because the results are
INCONCLUSIVE

No not ineffective, just INCONCLUSIVE. See my earlier reference to
the CDC.


Jesus, Inconclusive means it's possible the gun ban MAKE THINGS
WORSE. So in the absence of ANY evidence the gun ban had benefits you
want to keep rolling the dice when the result could just as easily be
MORE deaths plus the side effect of ****ing on the second amendment.


Geeze.... look up what "inconclusive" means.

Oh, good grief. You really are illiterate. It means that you cannot
draw any conclusions (Duh!). The results may be positive, neutral, or
negative but you can't come to any conclusions. However, the outcome
*MIGHT BE* harmful.

AC is perfectly correct. You're wrong (nothing new). QED.

Are you that illiterate.

IKWYABWAI is not a rational argument, not that it surprises anyone
here.

Get another dictionary so even you can understand it !!

You *are* an idiot. A stubborn one but an idiot, nonetheless.