On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:50:22 -0500, wrote:

On 7 Dec 2012 04:33:23 GMT, wrote:

On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:12:16 -0500, wrote:

On 6 Dec 2012 22:42:36 GMT, wrote:

On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 23:40:53 -0600, "NotMe" wrote:


wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:25:49 +0000 (UTC), Doug Miller
wrote:

wrote in :

BTW, you don't think a SSN is needed for tax reasons? boggle

Not at the time a person is *applying* for a job, no, it's not needed for
tax reasons.

Applicatoins also have the information needed to do any background
checks for employment. Why would you want to work for a company that
you can't trust with your SSN? Considering the number of people who
have your SSN, isn't this a little silly?

A lot of information is needed to complete the employment process including
personal and professional references. I don't and won't supply those unless
and until there is a determination of a skill set and other match for the
position.

Fair enough but note that you *will* be excluded from consideration by
many employers. I refused to supply this information, once, before
even a phone interview. That was the last I heard from the company.


It's unreasonable for an employer to expect that data at the get go.

It doesn't matter what *you* think is reasonable.

The name of the game is protecting your information. I have had experience
where someone else used my data obtained from a contract recruiter to pose
as me including signing my name and professional license number to federal
documents.

You've already lost. That horse is *long* gone. Do yourself a favor
and don't **** off prospective employers for no reason.

Rother **** them off and not have to work for idiots than to cave and
end up working for them - wishing you had not - be better off spending
your time looking for a job with a decent company - in MANY cases.

Utterly absurd.
That's your opinion.

No, it's not an opinion.

You are entitled to it. That and 2 bucks will
buy you a bad cup of coffee.

Two bucks?! It had better be hot.