On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:02:12 -0600, " Attila Iskander"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:15:11 -0600, " Attila Iskander"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:26:18 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:08:22 -0800, Oren wrote:




Would you work for a company that you could not trust with your SSN?

Would yo work for a company that wants your personal information for
no good reason?

They have good reason, so they ask.

The Stasi had "good reason" for going "Papieren" whenever they felt like
it
too.

Silly moral relativity answer, not to mention a Godwin call.


So what is the sound of an argument entering in one ear, exiting out the
other, and never slowing down in between..

I don't know but you seem to be able to answer your own question.

As to your "Godwin call", where did I make any mention of nazis ??
Apparently you're not even up to speed on Godwin..

Yes, in fact you did. The fact that you referenced the E. German
secret police instead of the SS is meaningless. Further, the fact
that you're now trying to back away from the reference is instructive.



That they have good reason (in their minds) does not necessarily make it
good reason for you or justify their asking

Bull****. Their job. You want it, or not? Your call.

My experience and expertise,
You want it or not ?
Your call

"Do you really think you're that unique? Nope. I din't need a Prima
Dona."

Unlike you, I was and still am in high enough demand, that It's a sellers'
market for me.

Your attitude is also quite instructive. It's amazing that anyone
would put up with it.

Hell, I don't even discuss $$$ and benies unless they have clearly stated
that here is a job on the table.

Irrelevant.

But then, unlike you, I'm not an easily replaceable drone..

You assume a lot and think an lot of yourself. Pass.