On 12/6/2012 6:33 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Smitty Two wrote:

Fact 1: The woman received THIRD DEGREE burns.

You don't need caps to emphasize your point.

Caps are one way to show emphasis. Nothing at all wrong in showing
emphasis.

Fact 2: The woman asked McD's to pay her medical bills, which IIRC
were a couple of hundred dollars.

Fact 3: She brought suit only AFTER McD refused to pay the paltry
medical bills.

That's close enough not to dispute.

Third degree burns, skin grafts and paltry ($300) shows someone is a
****ing liar as those statements don't work together. As Gunner said:

****
The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form of law
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
****

I raised that incident with reference to people doing things and then
casting the blame for the results on others. She did a bonehead thing and
McD paid for it - although not as much as the original jury award.

I think they all should be required to sell coffee to go in ceramic
coffee mugs, that way, stupid ****s will not be able to squeeze them
between their legs, and my ceramic coffee mug company will get busy in
this communist economy, along with my saw stop business, once that law
gets passed.

--
Jack
Got Change: Supply and Demand ====== Command and Control!
http://jbstein.com