Lieutenant Scott wrote:

Here's a clue, the interface is not an OS, not in MacOS, not in Windows,
not in Linux. Please, continue to prove that you're dumber than a rock
and you know ****-all about computing.

I don't care what's underneath,

You don't know what the OS is, that has been clear from your idiotic
witterings here.

neither does anyone.

I'm sure you can post a reference to the study that supports that claim.
Actually I'm sure you can't. People do care what the OS beneath the
interface is, because people discuss that OS and interact with that OS
outside of the GUI. So, once more, you are wrong. Hardly surprising
because your comment here, as with much of your other comment is founded
on ignorance.

What matters is the interface.

The interface is not the OS, it is the glitzy layer than isolates the
user from the details of the OS. Many thanks for once again proving that
you don't know what you are talking about. As usual with you, you slip
and slime and weasel your way from post to post trying to change the
subject. *You* started wibbling about MacOS. Now you are proving that
you hadn't got a clue what you were talking about.

And the Mac OS has a ****ing ****e one.

Wrong even at that level, as the large number of users ditching the bag
of nails that is Windows to take up use of Apple devices and computers
shows. Perhaps you can point to the Windows GUI features that rival the
Automator or Applescript? Since your setting out a position as an expert
in both GUIs I look forward to your detailed and insightful comment.